2018
DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Experience With the ICD 16.5 Mini-Scleral Lens for Optic and Therapeutic Purposes

Abstract: The present findings suggest that the ICD 16.5 mini-scleral GP lens is an effective and safe alternative for managing challenging corneas in a therapeutic impasse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this short communication, we report the fitting of a scleral contact lens with two peripheral areas, such as LCZ and SLZ, allowing theoretically a better control of the limbal clearance and how the lens rests on the conjunctival surface. 3 , 4 However, to date, the planning of changes in these areas are only based on subjective biomicroscopic analysis or on OCT images, but without knowing the real impact on the inner structures and vasculature of the superficial signs observed on slit lamp or OCT examination. OCTA is an additional option to control the impact of the peripheral scleral lens bearing on conjunctival vasculature and therefore to avoid complications derived from an excessive compression of the conjunctival tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this short communication, we report the fitting of a scleral contact lens with two peripheral areas, such as LCZ and SLZ, allowing theoretically a better control of the limbal clearance and how the lens rests on the conjunctival surface. 3 , 4 However, to date, the planning of changes in these areas are only based on subjective biomicroscopic analysis or on OCT images, but without knowing the real impact on the inner structures and vasculature of the superficial signs observed on slit lamp or OCT examination. OCTA is an additional option to control the impact of the peripheral scleral lens bearing on conjunctival vasculature and therefore to avoid complications derived from an excessive compression of the conjunctival tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an increasing interest in fully scleral gas permeable (GP) contact lenses in the last years 1 , 2 due to their ability of providing a successful visual rehabilitation in complex cases, such as irregular cornea (primary or secondary) and several dry eye cases, with a very comfortable wear, 3 5 even in those cases where all other contact lens options fail. 6 Although the fitting of these contact lenses has been simplified significantly in the last years, there are still some challenges in this process, 7 including the control of the relationship between lens and conjunctival surface and the level of lens indentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Other studies showed a much lower rate of abandoning ScCL due to handling problems. [5][6][7][8][9][10] One study broke down handling difficulty establishing that with application, 20% of patients had mild difficulty while 12% had moderate difficulty; and with removal, only 9% of patients had mild difficulty. 11 Kornberg and Wang found that application and removal was not a laborious process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Whereas, other studies have debunked difficulties with ScCL handling. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] ScCL complications related to handling are rare and most are managed without any lasting side-effects. It is crucial that patients understand the application and removal process and are trained in handling ScCL as patients may have initial difficulty with this process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICD lens from Paragon was used, which has been shown in previous studies and series to be a good option for irregular corneas. 9,10 We began the fitting with the spherical model of the lens, using a sagittal height calculated according to OCT measurements. The trial lens selected provided a comfortable wear and initially a good level of visual acuity, but the visual acuity worsened significantly at 15 days of wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%