2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.097501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First estimate of the NNLO nonresonant corrections to top-antitop threshold production at lepton colliders

Abstract: We compute the dominant term in the expansion in ρ = 1 − MW /mt of the unknown next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) nonresonant contributions to the e + e − → W + W − bb total cross section at energies close to the top-antitop threshold. Our analytic result disagrees with a previous calculation by other authors [1]. We show that our determination has the correct infrared structure needed to cancel the divergences proportional to the top width arising in the resonant production of the same final state, and we p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result for this diagram including its resonant counterpart indeed agrees with the above except for the constant term +1 (see (C.4), (C.5) in Appendix C). However, as was already mentioned in [27,30], contrary to the statement made in [31] there is a nonvanishing contribution from h 1b at the same order. We computed the O(α s /ρ) from this diagram explicitly, and find that the complete O(α s /ρ) contribution to the total cross section reads…”
Section: Comparison To [31]mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our result for this diagram including its resonant counterpart indeed agrees with the above except for the constant term +1 (see (C.4), (C.5) in Appendix C). However, as was already mentioned in [27,30], contrary to the statement made in [31] there is a nonvanishing contribution from h 1b at the same order. We computed the O(α s /ρ) from this diagram explicitly, and find that the complete O(α s /ρ) contribution to the total cross section reads…”
Section: Comparison To [31]mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It is instructive to construct the O(α s /ρ) terms from the results in [30] and in the present paper. We find that they arise only from…”
Section: Comparison To [31]mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the same reason, it will be mandatory to consider the process e + e − → W + W − bb including the non-resonant contributions. Non-resonant effects have been computed to NLO and partially to NNLO accuracy [33][34][35][36], and can be naturally separated in the framework of unstable particle EFT [37,38]. d) Electromagnetic initial-state radiation generates large logarithms ln(4m 2 t /m 2 e ), where m e is the electron mass, which must be summed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus omit the contributions related to non-ttresonant W + bW −b production discussed in Refs. [19,20,114], but note that they are included in our final matched predictions through the full QCD-LO and QCD-NLO W + bW −b cross section calculations, as described in Section 5. Furthermore, in this validation section we use the EHA in Whizard and consistently treat the top decay at LO in all analytic and MC results.…”
Section: Validation For the Inclusive Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%