2016
DOI: 10.3897/bdj.4.e11012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First detection of the adventive large rove beetle Ocypus nitens (Schrank) in Canada and an update of its Nearctic distribution using data generated by the public

Abstract: The adventive rove beetle Ocypus nitens (Staphylinidae: Staphylininae) is newly recorded in Canada (Ontario) and the state of Vermont, and additional range expansion is documented. The updated distribution of this large, conspicuous species is based mostly on data from digital photographs posted by users of the online community BugGuide. All available data are summarized and made available as a DarwinCore dataset, and an updated distribution map is provided. Citizen-generated distributional data continues to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 840 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, citizen-generated distributional data or 'digital collecting' based on photographs can serve as a valuable tool to study the ranges of selected taxa, including medically important and nonnative, invasive species, and species of conservation concern (Marshall 2008). Other studies have successfully used BugGuide locality data to augment professionally collected distributional data (Carlson et al 2012, Epps et al 2014, Bowles et al 2015, Brunke 2016, Hoebeke et al 2017, Wheeler 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, citizen-generated distributional data or 'digital collecting' based on photographs can serve as a valuable tool to study the ranges of selected taxa, including medically important and nonnative, invasive species, and species of conservation concern (Marshall 2008). Other studies have successfully used BugGuide locality data to augment professionally collected distributional data (Carlson et al 2012, Epps et al 2014, Bowles et al 2015, Brunke 2016, Hoebeke et al 2017, Wheeler 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Introduced species,” which includes any non-native species regardless of whether they are introduced accidentally or on purpose, were included in 400 publications (18.8%). There were high overlaps with “Distribution” and “New state records” as many of the publications reported the first records of introduced species in new areas (Hoebeke and Wheeler 2012, Bastardo and Perez-Gelabert 2021, Pinzon et al 2021) or used community photographs to document the spread of non-native species (Parys et al 2015, Brunke 2016, Romanowski et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%