2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First detection of stacked X-ray emission from cosmic web filaments

Abstract: We report the first statistical detection of X-ray emission from cosmic web filaments in ROSAT data. We selected 15 165 filaments at 0.2 <  z <  0.6 ranging from 30 Mpc to 100 Mpc in length, identified in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey survey. We stacked the X-ray count-rate maps from ROSAT around the filaments, excluding resolved galaxy groups and clusters above the mass of ∼3 × 1013 M⊙ as well as the detected X-ray point sources from the ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton observations. The stacked signal res… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
35
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
35
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We note here that the predicted X-ray in the simulations is sensitive to the assumed metallicity (here the metallicity is 0.3 of solar) as well as the exact energy range (the energy range used in the simulations is 0.3-2 keV rather than the 0.1-2.4 keV band of ROSAT). The average X-ray surface brightness found here from the real LRG pairs is ∼4-10 times higher than that reported by Tanimura et al (2020), who also stacked on the RASS data. Tanimura et al (2020) used more ROSAT channels, a different sample of filaments to stack, and a slightly different method of analysis all of which could explain the discrepancy.…”
Section: Cosmological Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note here that the predicted X-ray in the simulations is sensitive to the assumed metallicity (here the metallicity is 0.3 of solar) as well as the exact energy range (the energy range used in the simulations is 0.3-2 keV rather than the 0.1-2.4 keV band of ROSAT). The average X-ray surface brightness found here from the real LRG pairs is ∼4-10 times higher than that reported by Tanimura et al (2020), who also stacked on the RASS data. Tanimura et al (2020) used more ROSAT channels, a different sample of filaments to stack, and a slightly different method of analysis all of which could explain the discrepancy.…”
Section: Cosmological Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The average X-ray surface brightness found here from the real LRG pairs is ∼4-10 times higher than that reported by Tanimura et al (2020), who also stacked on the RASS data. Tanimura et al (2020) used more ROSAT channels, a different sample of filaments to stack, and a slightly different method of analysis all of which could explain the discrepancy.…”
Section: Cosmological Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.3). Although there have been very recent fruitful attempts at a first detection of this barely visible baryonic component (Macquart et al 2020;Tanimura et al 2020), there exist no accurate measurements of its distribution around isolated galaxies. However, we can safely continue as long as all estimates of g bar (in the measurements, models and simulations) are based on the same components (in our case: stars + cold gas).…”
Section: The Rar Of Kids Compared To Mg Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other claims to have detected the WHIM include possible detection of O VII lines, excess dispersion measure over our Galaxy and the host galaxy in fast rasio bursts (FRBs), and stacked X-ray emission from cosmic web filaments using the thermal Sunyaev-Zelodovich (tSZ) effect (e.g. Nicastro et al 2018;Macquart et al 2020;Tanimura et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%