2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First detection of oscillations in the Halo giant HD 122563: Validation of seismic scaling relations and new parameters

Abstract: Aims. The nearby metal-poor giant HD 122563 is an important astrophysical laboratory for which to test stellar atmospheric and interior physics. It is also a benchmark star for which to calibrate methods to apply to large scale surveys. Recently it has been remeasured using various methodologies given the new high precision instruments at our disposal. However, inconsistencies in the observations and models have been found. In order to better characterise this star using complementary techniques we have been m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(59 reference statements)
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates are fully consistent with the values we adopted in Bergemann et al (2012). Creevey et al (2019) propose a new asteroseismic surface gravity for HD 122563, log g = 1.39 ± 0.01 dex. This is a substantial downward revision of this parameter.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These estimates are fully consistent with the values we adopted in Bergemann et al (2012). Creevey et al (2019) propose a new asteroseismic surface gravity for HD 122563, log g = 1.39 ± 0.01 dex. This is a substantial downward revision of this parameter.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Decreasing the log g might help to increase the abundance from the resonance lines, but a change to log g < 0.5 would be necessary. All these changes in stellar parameters can be ruled out, given the robust constraints from asteroseismology and interferometry (Creevey et al 2012;Karovicova et al 2018;Creevey et al 2019). Also micro-turbulence, despite being a free parameter, is relatively well-constrained in the literature (Bergemann et al 2012;Afşar et al 2016).…”
Section: Benchmark Metal-poor Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.3. The power spectrum of the velocity time-series was calculated as both an un-weighted and weighted least-squares fit of sinusoidal components following Corsaro et al (2012) (see also Frandsen et al 1995;Arentoft et al 1998;Bedding et al 2004;Kjeldsen et al 2005;Creevey et al 2019). The resulting power was then converted into power spectral density (PSD) by normalizing for the spectral resolution, which is calculated as the integral of the spectral window of the observing set, here corresponding to ∼ 4.87 µHz.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to Creevey et al (2019) we used the Diamonds code (Corsaro & De Ridder 2014) for the Bayesian inference of the PSD of EK Eri. The model adopted consists in a simple flat noise component and a Gaussian envelope to model the oscillation power excess (Corsaro & De Ridder 2014).…”
Section: Extraction Of Global Seismic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the distance modulus is assumed to be 19.07 mag Okamoto et al (2012), then log g will decrease only by 0.07 dex. In the literature there are reports about a similar inconsistency of the positions of giant stars on the HR diagram with their evolutionary tracks, for example, for the halo giant HD 122563 with reliably measured atmospheric parameters (Creevey et al 2019). This may be related to uncertainties in the calculations of metal-poor tracks in the region of red giants.…”
Section: Stellar Atmosphere Parametersmentioning
confidence: 90%