2012
DOI: 10.2753/mtp1069-6679200304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Choice? Last Resort? Social Risks and Gift Card Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, receivers often view price as a sign of commitment and willingness to invest in the relationship (Camerer 1988; Cheal 1987), and price is a factor that significantly influences the price of reciprocated gifts (Pieters and Robben 1998). Furthermore, social norms about relationships often force givers to buy more expensive gifts to avoid looking cheap (Austin and Huang 2012; Goodwin, Smith, and Spiggle 1990), which may trigger a prevention focus goal to avoid negative impressions (Ashworth, Darke, and Schaller 2005). Second, price may signal the popularity and quality of a product.…”
Section: A Conceptual Model Of Gift Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, receivers often view price as a sign of commitment and willingness to invest in the relationship (Camerer 1988; Cheal 1987), and price is a factor that significantly influences the price of reciprocated gifts (Pieters and Robben 1998). Furthermore, social norms about relationships often force givers to buy more expensive gifts to avoid looking cheap (Austin and Huang 2012; Goodwin, Smith, and Spiggle 1990), which may trigger a prevention focus goal to avoid negative impressions (Ashworth, Darke, and Schaller 2005). Second, price may signal the popularity and quality of a product.…”
Section: A Conceptual Model Of Gift Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the supplier may increase the optimal wholesale price. 4. Uniformly distributed demand.…”
Section: Unredeemed Gift Cards Balances Become the State's Property (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that gift givers cannot know well the preference of gift receivers, the selected gifts may not be the ones those gift receivers really like and even may be the ones receivers already have. These unmatched behaviors between gift givers and gift receivers can lead to social risk (Austin and Huang [4]). To avoid wastage of the 350 JINGMING PAN, WENQING SHI AND XIAOWO TANG received gifts, gift receivers can return gift products where gift givers bought them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financially, Christmas gifts may account for 3.6% of a household's spending (Davies, Whelan, Foley, & Walsh, ). Sales on wedding gift registries reached $19 billion in a single year (Bradford & Sherry, ) and the gift card industry now exceeds $100 billion annually (Austin & Huang, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the functions of gifts is to symbolize the relationship (Areni, Kiecker, & Palan, ; Sherry, ); indeed, Belk, Wallendorf, and Sherry () contend this symbolic manifestation of the relationship sanctifies the gift. There is thus a large measure of social risk in giving and receiving gifts (Austin & Huang, ; Belk & Coon, ; Otnes, Lowrey, & Kim, ); indeed, the risk and reward occasioned by the gift's procurement, presentation, and reception extends to one's entire social network (Giesler, ; Lowrey, Otnes, & Ruth, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%