2000
DOI: 10.1080/01425690095162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Chance, Second Chance or Last Chance? Resistance and response to education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Fullarton et aI., 2003) A growing body of research on school retention seeks institutional, socio-economic, and personal factors that may impact on the completion of 12 years of schooling. Many of these studies identify students most at risk of leaving school without certification, or adequate educational or training requirements for on-going employment (Beavis, Curtis, & Curtis, 2005b;Gray & Beresford, 2002;Lamb et aI., 2004;Munns & McFadden, 2000;Ross & Gray, 2005;Wyn, Stokes, & Tyler, 2004). However, little research is available to explain the retention of students from their point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fullarton et aI., 2003) A growing body of research on school retention seeks institutional, socio-economic, and personal factors that may impact on the completion of 12 years of schooling. Many of these studies identify students most at risk of leaving school without certification, or adequate educational or training requirements for on-going employment (Beavis, Curtis, & Curtis, 2005b;Gray & Beresford, 2002;Lamb et aI., 2004;Munns & McFadden, 2000;Ross & Gray, 2005;Wyn, Stokes, & Tyler, 2004). However, little research is available to explain the retention of students from their point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is not to say the principles in question are not valuable, but the discursive formation with which they are practised and articulated diverges. The work of Hall andJefferson (1976, 1993), Willis (1977), McRobbie and Nava (1984), Wexler (1987), Levinson et al (1996), McDonald (1999), Munns and McFadden (2000), Wacquant (2003), Blackman (2005Blackman ( , 2010, Muggleton (2005) and Henderson et al (2007) characterises the approach outlined here. McFadden helps focus attention, stating that: convergence and divergence of intercultural relations in concrete problem contexts (for example, in schools between teacher and student cultures) ... is a question of intercultural articulations and connections and how they structure social options for individuals and groups in certain social settings.…”
Section: Relations and Relationships: Identity Perspective Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these researchers is, as mentioned, Willis (1977). However, Anyon (1983), Woods (1979), Furlong (1985, Munns and McFadden (2000), Zembylas (2010), Russell (2011), Högberg (2009) and Youdell (2012 also point to various forms of pupil responses in this sense. Two of these researchers, namely Högberg and Furlong, also include conformity and accommodation, and colonisation, innovation and ambivalence in the responses they have analysed.…”
Section: Background and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%