2017
DOI: 10.3386/w23721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First and Second Generation Impacts of the Biafran War

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Justino et al (2014) find a substantial human-capital loss among boys exposed to the Timor-Leste secession conflict , but not among girls. Similarly, as mentioned above, Akresh et al (2012aAkresh et al ( , 2017 find the highest negative impact among women exposed to conflict during adolescence. By contrast, León (2012) finds statistically significant effects in Peru if the exposure to conflict takes place in utero, in early childhood, or during the preschool years, but not during the primary and secondary school years.…”
Section: Existing Evidence Often Fails To Provide a Good Understandinsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Justino et al (2014) find a substantial human-capital loss among boys exposed to the Timor-Leste secession conflict , but not among girls. Similarly, as mentioned above, Akresh et al (2012aAkresh et al ( , 2017 find the highest negative impact among women exposed to conflict during adolescence. By contrast, León (2012) finds statistically significant effects in Peru if the exposure to conflict takes place in utero, in early childhood, or during the preschool years, but not during the primary and secondary school years.…”
Section: Existing Evidence Often Fails To Provide a Good Understandinsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Unfortunately, the focus of the literature on the early years of life results in other stages of child development not been sufficiently investigated. Of the 78 studies reviewed for this report, 28 examine the effects of shocks exclusively during the early years, and only 12 explore across age groups, including adolescence (Agüero and Deolalikar, 2012;Akresh et al, 2012aAkresh et al, , 2012bAkresh et al, , 2017Caruso, 2017;Caruso and Miller, 2015;Domingues and Barre, 2013;Gutierrez and Gallegos, 2016;La Mattina and Shemyakina, 2017;León, 2012;Scholte et al, 2015;Shah and Steinberg, 2017). Some of these studies have indeed shown that the legacy of conflict affects children at the early stages of life and also in adolescence, as well as the next generations (Agüero and Deolalikar, 2012;Akresh et al, 2012aAkresh et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Most Of the Existing Research Focuses On Exposure To Shocks mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, what we do know suggests that in specific emergency contexts -of war, for example -individuals exposed at an adolescent age are more severely impacted. 8 A relevant study on the Nigerian Civil War of 1967-1970 found that women who had been exposed to the war were shorter in height, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and were more likely to be overweight (Akresh et al, 2017). These adverse effects were larger for those exposed during adolescence (ages 13 to 16) in comparison to those exposed at an earlier age.…”
Section: What Do We Know?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents' achievements against the odds in contexts of response and recovery programmes provide some lessons. In Nigeria, for example, the outcomes of a universal primary education programme (UPE) implemented after the end of the civil war illustrated how an intervention following a negative shock (war, in this case) could partially offset its impacts: The UPE programme was found to mitigate the effects of war exposure on education by almost 70 per cent (Akresh et al, 2017). Similar positive results in terms of educational attainment have been found in large-scale education programmes following periods of crisis in Indonesia (Duflo, 2001), Benin (Wantchekon et al, 2015) and Vietnam (Dang, Hoang and Nguyen, 2018).…”
Section: What Do We Not Know and Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%