Firm Turnover in Imperfectly Competitive Markets

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the empirical regularity that industries differ greatly in the level of firm turnover and that entry and exit rates are positively correlated across industries. Our objective is to investigate the effect of fixed costs and, in particular, market size on entry and exit rates and hence on the age distribution of firms.We analyse a stochastic dynamic model of a monopolistically competitive industry. Each firm's efficiency is assumed to follow a Markov process. We show existence and uniqueness of a stationary equilibrium with simultaneous entry and exit: efficient firms survive, while inefficient ones leave the market and are replaced by new entrants. We perform comparative dynamics with respect to the level of fixed costs: entry costs are negatively related and fixed production costs positively related to entry and exit rates. A central empirical prediction of the model is that the level of firm turnover is increasing in market size. In larger markets, competition is endogenously more intense than in smaller markets, and so price-cost margins are smaller. This price competition effect implies that the marginal surviving firm has to be more efficient than in smaller markets. Hence, in larger markets, the expected lifespan of firms is shorter, and the age distribution of firms is first-order stochastically dominated by that in smaller markets.In the empirical part, the prediction on market size and firm turnover is tested on an industry where firms compete in well-defined geographical markets of different sizes. Using data on hair salons in Sweden, we show that an increase in market size or fixed costs shifts the age distribution of firms towards younger firms, as predicted by the model. 1.A previous version of this paper, using a different data-set, was circulated and presented under the title "Imperfect Competition, Market Size, and Firm Turnover".2. Caves (1998) provides a recent survey of the empirical literature on turnover and mobility of firms. See also Cabral (1997) and Sutton (1997b). 295 3. See Davis and Haltiwanger (1999) for a survey of the literature on gross job creation and destruction. 4. See Bartelsman and Doms (2000) for a review of the evidence.

Monopolistic Competition: Beyond the Constant Elasticity of Substitution

“…This could be accomplished by using the research strategy implemented by Asplund and Nocke (2006), who investigated the effect of market size on firm turnover. One approach is to isolate the effect of market size on the equilibrium output and/or price of specific products for which preferences are more or less homogeneous across particular geographical markets.…”

Small firms in Portugal: a selective survey of stylized facts, economic analysis, and policy implications

“…He shows that, in geographical areas where there is less competition, there is also greater variability in productivity levels. A related test is that of Asplund and Nocke (2005). They show that, in geographical markets where demand density is greater, and thus market competition more intense, the average life span of an entrant is lower.…”

Product Differentiation, Industry Concentration and Market Share Turbulence

“…Their results highlight that (for the most part), increases in market size are associated with increases in establishment size, which they argue is due to tougher competition in larger markets (building on an earlier literature looking at the toughness of (price) competition in oligopolies, where examples include Bresnahan and Reiss, 1991;Asplund and Sandin, 1999). Asplund and Nocke (2006) present a very interesting stochastic dynamic model of a monopolistically competitive industry where firms are heterogeneous (i.e. differ in their initial 'efficiency levels') and are subject to idiosyncratic shocks.…”