2006
DOI: 10.1142/s1363919606001429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm Strategies for Risk Management in Innovation

Abstract: Analysis of potential risks is fundamental to technology development, but the definition and control of such risks are often problematic. This paper examines the issues concerned, aiming for an improved understanding of how the evaluation of risk shapes the emergence of new technology. The paper highlights different firm strategies taken towards evaluating risky technology, working from the micro-level of project management, and drawing on relevant qualitative case studies. Some contributors call for a meshing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lindblom and Woodhouse, 1993; Das and Teng, 2004;Genus and Coles, 2006;Borgelt and Falk, 2007;Bowers and Khorakian, 2014;Weerawardena and Mort, 2006;Jablonowski, 2001;Miller, 1992;Lam and Kawamoto, 1997 Williamson (1975;1985). Alchian et al, 1978;Grossman and Hart, 1986;North and Weingast, 1989;Hart and Moore, 1990;Shleifer and Vishny, 1997;Rogerson, 1998.…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lindblom and Woodhouse, 1993; Das and Teng, 2004;Genus and Coles, 2006;Borgelt and Falk, 2007;Bowers and Khorakian, 2014;Weerawardena and Mort, 2006;Jablonowski, 2001;Miller, 1992;Lam and Kawamoto, 1997 Williamson (1975;1985). Alchian et al, 1978;Grossman and Hart, 1986;North and Weingast, 1989;Hart and Moore, 1990;Shleifer and Vishny, 1997;Rogerson, 1998.…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation can expose the firm to additional risk from both internal (e.g., financial and human resource) and external (e.g., external environment) factors. Innovation leading to higher returns has a positive impact on the firm, whereas innovation leading to poor investment decisions can have a detrimental impact on firm profitability (Genus and Coles 2006). The negative impact of the potential risk can be a significant obstacle to innovation within firms (Borgelt and Falk 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to focus on highly defined customer needs, innovation opportunities and threat of competition can provide a strategic tension for the small firm (Toften and Hammervoll 2010;Fergusson 1988;Ford et al 2014;Debruyne and Reibstein 2005;Dalgic 2011;Hezar et al 2006;Bantel 1997;Delaney,1995;Jain2005). Hamlin et al (2012) consider firm survival, suggesting that strategic search for new niches needs to be on-going (see also Genus andColes 2006, McGrath, 1995). For Hunt (2013) and Corrocher and Guerzoni (2015), small firms survive as specialist innovators supplying parts, complementary knowledge and design modifications to established and emerging sectors.…”
Section: Balancing Innovation and Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%