1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(94)00807-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
386
5
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 748 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
24
386
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…6 For example, the average CEO turnover rate in our sample is 21.04%, implying that more than one-fifth of the CEOs were replaced during the sample period. This figure is not only higher than that reported by Huson, Malatesta et al (2004) for US firms (9.3%) but also that provided by Kang and Shivdasani (1995) for Japanese firms (12.88%). It is close, however, to the 25.51% and 24% documented by Firth et al (2002) and Kato and Long (2006), respectively, for Chinese listed firms during the period 1995 to 2001.…”
Section: Summary Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…6 For example, the average CEO turnover rate in our sample is 21.04%, implying that more than one-fifth of the CEOs were replaced during the sample period. This figure is not only higher than that reported by Huson, Malatesta et al (2004) for US firms (9.3%) but also that provided by Kang and Shivdasani (1995) for Japanese firms (12.88%). It is close, however, to the 25.51% and 24% documented by Firth et al (2002) and Kato and Long (2006), respectively, for Chinese listed firms during the period 1995 to 2001.…”
Section: Summary Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…There is evidence of the supervisory behaviour of large shareholders in the adoption of anti-acquisition amendments. Kaplan and Minton (1994), Kang and Shivdasani (1995) and Franks et al (1996) found evidence of a positive influence of large shareholders on the probability of managerial turnover in poorlyperforming firms. There is also evidence of moderation in managerial remuneration in firms that have large shareholders (Dyl 1988;Hambrick and Finckelstein 1995).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the transition to a market economy will go further, we may see more visible change in empirical results of this country even in the near future. Coughlan and Schmidt (1985), Weisbach (1988), Martin and McConnell (1991), Kang and Shivdasani (1995), Denis et al (1997), Goyal and Park (2002), Abe and Oguro (2004), Huson et al (2004), and others. 2 In this paper, CEOs denote not only chief executive officers in the western terms, but also company presidents and general directors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the average CEO tenure (7 to 8 years) and turnover frequency (10 to 11%) for Russian corporations over the past few years have been almost the same as those for American and Japanese companies. In terms of the frequency of outside CEO succession (40 to 50%), Russian firms have kept their level 10 to 20% higher than the average for corporations in developed countries (Weisbach, 1988;Martin and McConnell, 1991;Kang and Shivdasani, 1995;Muravyev, 2001;Rachinsky, 2002;Muravyev, 2003a;Abe and Oguro, 2004;Yasin, 2004). Therefore, the increasing upward trend of CEO turnover frequency shown in Figure 1 can be attributed to the accelerated development of flexibility of CEO appointment against the background of declining insider control and the aging of Soviet-generation managers (so-called "red executives").…”
Section: Managerial Turnover In Transition Russia: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%