1978
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6112.556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm, patient, and process variables associated with length of stay in four diseases

Abstract: and conclusions Factors associated with length of stay in three London teaching hospitals during 1972 and 1975 were examined in patients treated for myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, inguinal hernia without obstruction, and gall stones. Statistical analyses were carried out with multiple regressions on log lengths of stay. Increased length of stay was associated with infection in all four groups and with the seriousness of operative procedures in all but patients with cerebrovascular disease. Alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the medical and surgical groups showed bias in the number of males having medical and surgical treatment. Although the mortality after cholecystectomy is slightly higher in males (1 8) the sex of the patient does not appear to affect significantly the length of stay (19), which is one of the main outcome measures of this study. Comparisons of other variables showed no obvious bias that might have affected the outcomes and, given that the main aim of the study was to determine the least costly approach and not precise differences in costs, the retrospective cohort method was probably satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussioamentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Comparisons of the medical and surgical groups showed bias in the number of males having medical and surgical treatment. Although the mortality after cholecystectomy is slightly higher in males (1 8) the sex of the patient does not appear to affect significantly the length of stay (19), which is one of the main outcome measures of this study. Comparisons of other variables showed no obvious bias that might have affected the outcomes and, given that the main aim of the study was to determine the least costly approach and not precise differences in costs, the retrospective cohort method was probably satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussioamentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is used for various purposes, such as management of hospital care, quality control, appropriateness of hospital use and hospital planning [1,2]. LOS is an indirect estimator of resources consumption and of the efficiency of one of the aspects of hospital patient care: bed management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%