2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.105.178102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firing-Rate Response of a Neuron Receiving Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Shot Noise

Abstract: The synaptic coupling between neurons in neocortical networks is sufficiently strong so that relatively few synchronous synaptic pulses are required to bring a neuron from rest to the spiking threshold. However, such finite-amplitude effects of fluctuating synaptic drive are missed in the standard diffusion approximation. Here exact solutions for the firing-rate response to modulated presynaptic rates are derived for a neuron receiving additive excitatory and inhibitory synaptic shot noise with exponential amp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a "shotnoise" model of synaptic inputs with very large amplitudes. It can be shown that f-I curves of LIF neurons in the presence of such inputs also exhibit an expansive nonlinearity (Richardson and Swarbrick, 2010). Therefore, we expect our results to apply qualitatively also in this situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This is consistent with a "shotnoise" model of synaptic inputs with very large amplitudes. It can be shown that f-I curves of LIF neurons in the presence of such inputs also exhibit an expansive nonlinearity (Richardson and Swarbrick, 2010). Therefore, we expect our results to apply qualitatively also in this situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For white-noise-driven integrate-and-fire (IF) neurons this problem is generally tractable (e.g., [1][2][3][4]), but efforts to integrate key aspects of neuronal signaling into the IF formalism have added to its complexity. First, synaptic input consists of discrete action potentials, which results in non-Gaussian voltage distributions and affects firing statistics [5][6][7][8]. Second, synaptic communication is mediated by two separate (excitatory and inhibitory) systems with distinct kinetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then used exactly the same methods as before. It is possible to calculate the membrane distribution more precisely (Richardson and Gerstner, 2006;Richardson and Swarbrick, 2010), but this simple current-based method was already accurate enough in our case. Figure 12b shows that our theoretical prediction remains reasonably accurate in this complex situation, which is far from the ideal setting (synaptic conductances rather than currents, shot noise rather than diffusion).…”
Section: Effect Of Synaptic Conductancesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is possible to calculate the membrane distribution more precisely with more sophisticated methods (Rudolph and Destexhe, 2003a;Richardson and Gerstner, 2006;Richardson and Swarbrick, 2010), but this simple method was sufficient in our case.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%