2013
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firing of antagonist small‐diameter muscle afferents reduces voluntary activation and torque of elbow flexors

Abstract: Key points• Maintained firing of fatigue-sensitive small-diameter muscle afferents is reported to reduce voluntary activation of the homonymous (fatigued) muscle.• Our study determined if firing of fatigue-sensitive afferents from elbow extensor muscles reduces voluntary activation and torque of the non-fatigued elbow flexors.• We examined voluntary activation of the elbow flexors by measuring changes in superimposed twitches evoked by magnetic cortical stimulation during maximal voluntary contractions.• Follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
76
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(98 reference statements)
6
76
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Across participants, those who reported higher final perceived effort were stronger and hence had higher target torques. This relationship is consistent with an influence of fatigue-sensitive small-diameter afferents on perceived effort, as higher muscle forces lead to higher intramuscular pressure, poorer perfusion, and increased concentrations of metabolites (Kennedy et al 2013; Kennedy et al 2014; Kennedy et al 2015). However, this is unlikely to be the only factor underlying increasing effort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Across participants, those who reported higher final perceived effort were stronger and hence had higher target torques. This relationship is consistent with an influence of fatigue-sensitive small-diameter afferents on perceived effort, as higher muscle forces lead to higher intramuscular pressure, poorer perfusion, and increased concentrations of metabolites (Kennedy et al 2013; Kennedy et al 2014; Kennedy et al 2015). However, this is unlikely to be the only factor underlying increasing effort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…; Kennedy et al . ), motor unit rotation during exercise (Bawa & Murnaghan, ), or alterations of motor unit firing rate during exercise (Bigland‐Ritchie et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Kennedy et al . ), is likely progressively increased throughout the all‐out protocol. It may, therefore, be anticipated that the attenuation of group III/IV muscle afferent feedback will exacerbate the ATP cost of contraction only during the latter portion of the all‐out protocol, when activation of these muscle afferents is high and motor unit recruitment strategies are highly influential on exercise performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced exercise capacity and accelerated neuromuscular fatigue within the tested muscle groups have been attributed to central inhibitory factors mediated by afferent feedback from pre‐fatigued muscles (Kennedy et al . ; Sidhu et al . ; Halperin et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%