Firefly Courtship: Behavioral and Morphological Predictors of Male Mating Success in Photinus greeni

Abstract

Differences in male mating success can generate selection on male morphological traits and courtship behaviors involved in male–male competition or female mate choice. In Photinus fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), courtship is based on bioluminescent flash signals produced by both sexes. We conducted field observations of Photinus greeni fireflies engaged in competitive courtships, in which females are able to simultaneously assess several males, to identify male morphological traits and courtship behaviors that might predict male mating success. Male morphological traits did not differ between males that successfully mated compared with unsuccessful males (dialoging males that did not mate). However, courtship behavioral interactions differed: successful males tended to have higher flash pattern rates (number of flash patterns per minute), and their courtship flashes were more likely to be answered by females. We also examined how the risk of predation by Photuris fireflies altered courtship behavior of their Photinus prey. When predatory Photuris fireflies were present, P. greeni females were less likely to mate, and showed decreased flash responses to most males. However, P. greeni males that did successfully mate in spite of Photuris presence were males that maintained high flash pattern rates that elicited female responses. These results suggest that both female mate choice and Photuris predation exert strong selective pressures on the evolution of courtship signals in Photinus fireflies.

Localization Error and Search Costs during Mate Choice in Túngara Frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus

“…In fact, increased search costs can cause females to become less choosy or even reverse their preferences for normally attractive mates (Evans et al. 2004; Schwartz & Hendry 2006, 2007; Dunn & Whittingham 2007), increase thresholds of mate attractiveness for mating (Demary et al. 2006; Su & Li 2006; Vélez & Brockmann 2006), reduce search times (Karino et al.…”

Dangerous liaisons: the predation risks of receiving social signals

“…Koga et al 1998;Bonachea & Ryan 2011) or their attraction to otherwise preferred, conspicuous males after exposure to a predator (e.g. Hedrick & Dill 1993;Gong & Gibson 1996;Johnson & Basolo 2003), or increase thresholds of mate attractiveness for mating after exposure to predator cues (Demary et al 2006) also suggest that receiving male signals incurs a risk of predation. Signals other than those used for mate attraction may also elevate a receiver's risk of predation.…”

Functional physiology of lantern shark (Etmopterus spinax) luminescent pattern: differential hormonal regulation of luminous zones

“…These photophores are divided into two types: extrinsic photophores, which shelter symbiotic luminous bacteria, and intrinsic photophores, which are self-luminescent, containing an endogenous luminescent system (Herring, 1982). To bring an adaptive advantage to their owner, photophores should be precisely controlled as the efficiency of luminescent behaviours depends on the timing and the physical characteristics of luminescence (Warner et al, 1979;Denton et al, 1985;Branham and Greenfield, 1996;Harper and Case, 1999;Demary et al, 2006;Rivers and Morin, 2008).…”