“…18, 1175.91, 1654.18, 1670.65, 1314.68, and 1552.95 W compared to series parallel and TCT configurations under various shading scenarios such as downward corner (DL), X-shape, double side (DS), C-shape, quadra corner (QC), and Tetris shape (TS). 27 In Rezk et al, 28 coyote optimization algorithm (COA) is shown to have the best performance compared to flower pollination algorithm (FPA)-, MPA-, and BOA-based PV array configurations. Moreover, for all shading cases, the COA-based PV array improved power output by 26.58%, 21.69%, 7.69%, and 7.69%.…”