2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire risk assessment in the Brazilian Amazon using MODIS imagery and change vector analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These spectral measures can change based on the observation time and fire factors, such as the severity of the fire, the time elapsed since the fire was extinguished, type of vegetation and soil exposure [14,30,31]. Thus, different methods were proposed to enhance and detect burnt areas and minimize the spectral confusion, for example, spectral indices [32][33][34], change detection algorithm using difference between pre-and post-fire [35,36]; spectral mixture analysis [37,38]; change vector analysis [39]; neural networks [40][41][42]; and object-based classification [43,44]. However, classification algorithms for burnt areas may lead to very different results [45].…”
Section: Burnt Area Classification and Fire Recurrence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectral measures can change based on the observation time and fire factors, such as the severity of the fire, the time elapsed since the fire was extinguished, type of vegetation and soil exposure [14,30,31]. Thus, different methods were proposed to enhance and detect burnt areas and minimize the spectral confusion, for example, spectral indices [32][33][34], change detection algorithm using difference between pre-and post-fire [35,36]; spectral mixture analysis [37,38]; change vector analysis [39]; neural networks [40][41][42]; and object-based classification [43,44]. However, classification algorithms for burnt areas may lead to very different results [45].…”
Section: Burnt Area Classification and Fire Recurrence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MODIS active fire hotspots have been used for validating the fire danger model in various studies as a proxy for the actual occurrence of fires (Chuvieco et al, 2008;Maeda et al, 2011;Adab et al, 2013;Eskandari and Chuvieco, 2015;Babu et al, 2016a, b). Similarly, in the present study, MODIS active fire product MCD14 has been used for the validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MODIS active fire hotspots have been used for validating the fire danger model in various studies as a proxy for the actual occurrence of fires [16][17][18][19]. In general, the accuracy of the developed fire danger index depends on the number of fires fell in very high and high fire danger classes and estimated accuracy was ranging from 72% to 91% and the overall accuracy was around 81.27%.…”
Section: = ( − )mentioning
confidence: 99%