2020
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2020.06258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire Detection Method Based on Improved Fruit Fly Optimization-Based SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we designed an algorithm to select the appropriate link from which to extract the two correlation coefficient features. By setting the short step sliding time window mechanism, we divided the data packet into several data segments to support vector machine (SVM) model off-line training and performance testing [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Finally, the system was set for real-time detection with the appropriate model parameters.…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we designed an algorithm to select the appropriate link from which to extract the two correlation coefficient features. By setting the short step sliding time window mechanism, we divided the data packet into several data segments to support vector machine (SVM) model off-line training and performance testing [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Finally, the system was set for real-time detection with the appropriate model parameters.…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional features extraction methods rely on eigenvalue function to screen eigenvalues as features [3][4][5]. Traditional classification models include Decision Tree [6][7], Bayesian classifier [8][9], Support Vector Machine [10][11], etc. However, the traditional numerical representation method has two major problems: semantic gap and dimension explosion; the traditional feature extraction method has poor ability to identify typical features; and the traditional classification models relies heavily on specific tasks, and the text association relationship processing is rough [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%