2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-15881-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire danger forecasting using machine learning-based models and meteorological observation: a case study in Northeastern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In northeastern Chinam researchers compared different methods and approaches for forecasting fire danger. Models included long short-term memory, ANN, ARIMA, gradient boosting, and support vector regressor for the estimation method [85]. Other approaches involve more complex models using satellite images with deep generative models [86] and a combination of naïve Bayes with autoregressive approaches for forecasting burned area [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In northeastern Chinam researchers compared different methods and approaches for forecasting fire danger. Models included long short-term memory, ANN, ARIMA, gradient boosting, and support vector regressor for the estimation method [85]. Other approaches involve more complex models using satellite images with deep generative models [86] and a combination of naïve Bayes with autoregressive approaches for forecasting burned area [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical-mathematical models that take into account meteorological data input are also tested and used to monitor risks in other parts of the world, such as New Zealand, where the authors of [17] investigated the wind vector change using a model integrated with the Fire Weather Index (FWI). In China, also using the same FWI model, the authors of [18] combined two machine learning models with the FWI, namely the long short-term memory (LSTM) and random forest (RF) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%