2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire behaviour of reinforced concrete slabs under combined biaxial in-plane and out-of-plane loads

Abstract: To better understand the fire behaviour of in-plane restrained reinforced concrete slabs, this paper presents six fire tests on two-way spanning concrete slabs under compressive bi-axial in-plane and flexural outof-plane loads. The data presented include furnace temperatures, temperature distributions, vertical and horizontal deflections, restraint forces, crack patterns, and characterisation of spalling of the six slabs during both heating and cooling phases. Comparison of the results indicates that bi-axial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8] with no horizontal restraint were free to move horizontally, and thus the arch action or compressive membrane action cannot be reasonably considered during the fire tests. In recent years, Wang et al [9,10] conducted a series of full-scale fire tests on the reinforced concrete slabs which included five square slabs and four rectangular slabs under combined uniaxial in-plane and out-of-plane loading, along with vertical restraints at the four corners of the slabs. The test results indicate that the fire behaviour of the restrained slabs is dependent on the restraint type, restraint level and slab aspect ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] with no horizontal restraint were free to move horizontally, and thus the arch action or compressive membrane action cannot be reasonably considered during the fire tests. In recent years, Wang et al [9,10] conducted a series of full-scale fire tests on the reinforced concrete slabs which included five square slabs and four rectangular slabs under combined uniaxial in-plane and out-of-plane loading, along with vertical restraints at the four corners of the slabs. The test results indicate that the fire behaviour of the restrained slabs is dependent on the restraint type, restraint level and slab aspect ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the mid‐span deflections of these tests did not reach the normal furnace‐test limit of span/30 even when they undergo a long heating period of approximately 5 hours. In contrast, a review of literature shows that the mid‐deflections of conventional simply‐supported slabs often exceed the limit of span/30 or span/20, if they undergo the similar heating period. Hence, in term of the structural stiffness and strength, the present tested slabs had good performance compared to what could be expected from the behavior of conventional concrete slabs, although they have higher temperature gradient, steel temperatures and serious spalling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For each test, sand bags (each weighing 50 kg) were placed on the slab to simulate the live loads, and the applied loads were equivalent to a uniformly distributed load of 2.0 kN/m 2 , which is recommended in the reference …”
Section: Test Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations