1952
DOI: 10.1021/ac60070a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire Assay for Osmium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Losses of osmium due to retention by the slag or the volatilization of OsO4 formed during the cupellation were also reported. 25 Losses of ruthenium in the form of RuO4 during the fusion and cuppelation were negligible.…”
Section: Fire Assaymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Losses of osmium due to retention by the slag or the volatilization of OsO4 formed during the cupellation were also reported. 25 Losses of ruthenium in the form of RuO4 during the fusion and cuppelation were negligible.…”
Section: Fire Assaymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In both pure geochemical as well as exploration studies, it is necessary to use a large sample size (10-50 g) to overcome 'nugget effects' for the PGE determinations, and NiS fire-assay is the best method for the separation of PGE from the rock matrix although there are also potential losses of Os on dissolution (Allan & Beamish, 1952 (Balaram, Patil, et al, 2006a;Hoffman, 1992;Satyanarayanan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Pgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the recovery of osmium by collection in lead was discussed by Allan and Beamish (6). Measured by means of synthetic samples the loss of osmium may reach 6%.…”
Section: Noble Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%