2019
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire and development influences on sagebrush community plant groups across a climate gradient in northern Nevada

Abstract: The sagebrush biome covers much of the western United States yet is at risk from ongoing disturbances. Physical disturbances such as fire often overcome the resistance of sagebrush communities to biological disturbances such as invasion by non‐native species, but the impact of burn severity or combined disturbance types on sagebrush community composition remains unclear. We examined the relationship between native functional groups and non‐native annual grass cover to the number of fires, burn severity, anthro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results provide a new, local, southwestern United States perspective on the broad concern regarding declining sagebrush, which has largely come from research in the Great Basin (e.g., Wood et al, 2019). Increases in other shrub species have been documented in arid and semi‐arid grasslands around the globe, as well as in other parts of New Mexico during the last century (Huenneke et al, 2002; D'Odorico et al, 2012; Brunelle et al, 2014; Bestelmeyer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These results provide a new, local, southwestern United States perspective on the broad concern regarding declining sagebrush, which has largely come from research in the Great Basin (e.g., Wood et al, 2019). Increases in other shrub species have been documented in arid and semi‐arid grasslands around the globe, as well as in other parts of New Mexico during the last century (Huenneke et al, 2002; D'Odorico et al, 2012; Brunelle et al, 2014; Bestelmeyer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A second reason for low variation in grass cover among ecological sites over time in our study area was the shared attributes of soil temperature and moisture regime across all sites and only subtle differences in soil texture, historical and degraded plant community composition, and other site attributes described by NRCS for the ecological sites in the study area. Similarly, a third reason for low variation among ecological sites was the homogenizing effect (sensu Foster et al, 2013) of the 2011 fire, with likely cumulative influences from past fires and grazing (Chambers and Wisdom, 2009;Davies et al, 2012;Bernards and Morris, 2016;Mahood and Balch, 2019;Wood et al, 2019;Ellsworth et al, 2020). This homogenization has occurred throughout the study area across ecological sites, as community composition of all ecological sites converged toward an annual grass state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, fire never appeared in our sets of top predictors. However, fire can radically change vegetation phenology, wherein its effects last for multiple years, depending on the fire severity and speed of recovery (Miller et al, 2013;Vermeire and Russell, 2018;Wood et al, 2019;Vanderhoof et al, 2020;Gemitzi and Koutsias, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). If fire resulted in a change in land-cover type, pixels would have shifted vegetation class (such as from forest to grassland) in our approach.…”
Section: Further Study and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%