2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finsler's Lemma for matrix polynomials

Abstract: Abstract. Finsler's Lemma charactrizes all pairs of symmetric n × n real matrices A and B which satisfy the property that v T Av > 0 for every nonzero v ∈ R n such that v T Bv = 0. We extend this characterization to all symmetric matrices of real multivariate polynomials, but we need an additional assumption that B is negative semidefinite outside some ball. We also give two applications of this result to Noncommutative Real Algebraic Geometry which for n = 1 reduce to the usual characterizations of positive p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we are about to model the parametric uncertainty of the system via an LFT structure shown in Fig. 1, so for clarification of LFT representation, let M be a complex matrix partitioned as [4]…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we are about to model the parametric uncertainty of the system via an LFT structure shown in Fig. 1, so for clarification of LFT representation, let M be a complex matrix partitioned as [4]…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are about to model the parametric uncertainty of the system via an LFT structure shown in Fig. , so for clarification of LFT representation, let M be a complex matrix partitioned as M=M11M12M21M22double-struckR(nq+ny)×(np+nw) and let normalΔRnp×nq be another complex matrix. Then we can formally define an LFT with respect to Δ as the map Ffalse(M,false):Cq1×p1Cp2×q2Ffalse(M,normalΔfalse)=M22+M21normalΔfalse(IM11normalΔfalse)1M12 provided that the inverse ( I − M 11 Δ) −1 exists (if exists, the LFT is said to be well defined.).…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remembering that if µ (s) is a solution to (F2) then X (s) = − 1 2 µ (s) B T (s) is a solution to (F3), it is easy to apply the results of Section III-A to give some sufficient conditions that allow simple functional dependence like continuity or polynomial dependence on s for the variable X (s) in (F3) without loss of generality. Among these possible extensions, one may point out the next theorem which deals with a case closely related to [10] and [20]. Theorem 6.…”
Section: B Consequences For the Matrix-valued Function X (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxation is a good resort when the solution space is little known. Another approach considered in the literature is to find some properties on the parameter set S and on the matrices of the system in order to reduce the search space of the solutions [10], [20]. In fact, if S is a compact set and the matrices of the PD-LMI depend continuously on the parameter, in [10] it is proved that if the PD-LMI has a solution, then one can restrict the search for a solution in the set of polynomial functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation