2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite volume TVD formulation of lattice Boltzmann simulation on unstructured mesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patil and Lakshmisha (2009) present an alternative approach to solving the lattice Boltzmann equation on 2D unstructured meshes. Instead of using vertex-centred finite volume method, they choose the elements (triangles) as their control volumes, which is beneficial for the implementation and the performance, as it greatly simplifies the structure of the streaming and collision matrices, as well as the solid boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patil and Lakshmisha (2009) present an alternative approach to solving the lattice Boltzmann equation on 2D unstructured meshes. Instead of using vertex-centred finite volume method, they choose the elements (triangles) as their control volumes, which is beneficial for the implementation and the performance, as it greatly simplifies the structure of the streaming and collision matrices, as well as the solid boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite volume LBM implementation in UFS follows that of Ref. [44]. Special procedures and structures map UFS's regular Cartesian velocity grid to the LBM velocity grids.…”
Section: Lattice Boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared their method to the central discretization scheme of Peng et al (1999) and achieved stability at higher Reynolds numbers. Observing that central schemes can introduce non-physical oscillations, and that vertex-centered finite-volume formulations require large amounts of memory storage for the boundary fluxes, Patil and Lakshmisha (2009) introduced a cellcentered finite-volume formulation coupled to a Total Variation Diminishing scheme for the flux calculations. They concluded that their method showed better numerical stability than the central scheme.…”
Section: Intrdouctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, delaying the application of local time-stepping on the continuity equation by a few tens of thousands of iterations also improves convergence time, because it reduces solution oscillations introduced by the initial pressure waves generated at the airfoil wall. The use of a local time-stepping strategy in the context of lattice Boltzmann methods on unstructured meshes is also suggested by Patil and Lakshmisha (2009).…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Convergence Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%