2016
DOI: 10.14736/kyb-2015-6-1049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time tracking control of multiple nonholonomic mobile robots with external disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to transformation (18), we only need to prove that e j = 0(j = 1, 2) in a fixed time. Based on Theorem 3.1, we can obtain that θ e (t) = 0 in a fixed time T θ .…”
Section: Velocity Control Law Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to transformation (18), we only need to prove that e j = 0(j = 1, 2) in a fixed time. Based on Theorem 3.1, we can obtain that θ e (t) = 0 in a fixed time T θ .…”
Section: Velocity Control Law Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, it is of particular interest to realise the control system in a finite time to meet specifc system requirement. Therefore, finite-time control problems draw some researchers' attention [2,6,12,18,26]. At present, many meaningful finite-time tracking control results for nonholonomic mobile robot systems have been reported in the literature [14,20,24,27] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n − 1 to be determined later. Based on the estimated states, we design an output feedback control law of the form (24) whereẑ = (z 1 ,ẑ 2 , . .…”
Section: Positive Definite Proper and Satisfy The Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, η n ) T . Moreover, the closed-loop system composed by (12), (23) and (24) can be written as the following compact form dZ = Ξ(Z) dt = (z 2 , . .…”
Section: Positive Definite Proper and Satisfy The Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation