2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time thin film rupture driven by modified evaporative loss

Abstract: Rupture is a nonlinear instability resulting in a finite-time singularity as a fluid layer approaches zero thickness at a point. We study the dynamics of rupture in a generalized mathematical model of thin films of viscous fluids with evaporative e↵ects. The governing lubrication model is a fourth-order nonlinear parabolic partial di↵erential equation with a non-conservative loss term due to evaporation. Several di↵erent types of finite-time singularities are observed due to balances between evaporation and su… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many forms of disjoining pressure reported in literature and different choices of disjoining pressure cause different flow behavior in a thin film [35,36]. The disjoining pressure for the system considered here is the classical φ = A/(6π h 3 ), obtained by integrating the attractive part of 12-6 LJ potential over a semi-infinitely extended substrate (the repulsive part makes a negligible contribution to the linear stability growth), where A is the Hamaker constant equal to the difference between the Hamaker constant of the liquid film itself and the liquid-solid interactions, i.e., A = A ll − A ls [28,37].…”
Section: Stochastic Thin-film Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many forms of disjoining pressure reported in literature and different choices of disjoining pressure cause different flow behavior in a thin film [35,36]. The disjoining pressure for the system considered here is the classical φ = A/(6π h 3 ), obtained by integrating the attractive part of 12-6 LJ potential over a semi-infinitely extended substrate (the repulsive part makes a negligible contribution to the linear stability growth), where A is the Hamaker constant equal to the difference between the Hamaker constant of the liquid film itself and the liquid-solid interactions, i.e., A = A ll − A ls [28,37].…”
Section: Stochastic Thin-film Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the approach in [24,43] and perturb the uniform film by an infinitesimal Fourier mode disturbance…”
Section: Stability Of Spatially Uniform Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase plane for the second-order steady state solutions satisfying(24) in the critical case with 0 < P0 < P . The homoclinic orbit in solid line corresponds to the droplet solution in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear case q = −ψ(h)∇h can be made somewhat like the thin-film equation. For example if ψ(h) = κ(h 3 + βh −3 ), then the PDE resembles the case of a thin fluid film subject to van der Waals forces; this situation was studied in Winter et al [47] and many other places (e.g., [26]).…”
Section: Nonlinear Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%