2021 11th International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icist52614.2021.9440646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time Synchronization of Fractional-Order Neural Networks With Time-Varying Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many classical results focusing on their dynamical behaviors, such as stability, synchronization, and passivity, have been obtained. For example, in [7], the global stability of complex valued FOCNNs with nodes in unequal dimensions and time delays was analyzed using comparison theory; in [8], the stability analysis of FOCNNs with time delays was investigated; in addition, the stability of two three-dimensional FOCNNs with different ring structures and time delays were analyzed; in [9], the authors studied the quantized output feedback synchronization of FOCNNs with output coupling; in [10], the authors considered the finite-time synchronization of FOCNNs with time-varying delays; the results were proved to be applicable to the FOCNNs without time delays and integer-order neural networks; in [11], the authors innovatively introduced the concept of finite-time passivity for FOCNNs with multiple state coupling or multiple derivative coupling; in [12], based on the existing passivity definition, the authors proposed the concepts of finite-time input strict passivity, finite-time output strict passivity, and finitetime strict passivity for FOCNNs; in addition, novel delay-dependent and order-dependent sufficient conditions ensuring the passivity performances were obtained for FOCNNs. More interesting results can be found in [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many classical results focusing on their dynamical behaviors, such as stability, synchronization, and passivity, have been obtained. For example, in [7], the global stability of complex valued FOCNNs with nodes in unequal dimensions and time delays was analyzed using comparison theory; in [8], the stability analysis of FOCNNs with time delays was investigated; in addition, the stability of two three-dimensional FOCNNs with different ring structures and time delays were analyzed; in [9], the authors studied the quantized output feedback synchronization of FOCNNs with output coupling; in [10], the authors considered the finite-time synchronization of FOCNNs with time-varying delays; the results were proved to be applicable to the FOCNNs without time delays and integer-order neural networks; in [11], the authors innovatively introduced the concept of finite-time passivity for FOCNNs with multiple state coupling or multiple derivative coupling; in [12], based on the existing passivity definition, the authors proposed the concepts of finite-time input strict passivity, finite-time output strict passivity, and finitetime strict passivity for FOCNNs; in addition, novel delay-dependent and order-dependent sufficient conditions ensuring the passivity performances were obtained for FOCNNs. More interesting results can be found in [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%