2019
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2018.2827993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Time Stabilization of Stochastic High-Order Nonlinear Systems With FT-SISS Inverse Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergence analysis By Lemma , the following inequality holds: alignleftalign-1l=2nΨlalign-2=l=2nξlxlrθvlξlθvl4θσvlθdralign-1align-2l=2n2vlθ1ξlxl(rξl)4θσvlvldralign-1align-2=l=2nal|xlξl|4θσvl, for positive constants a l ( l =2,…, n ). Discussed as in the work of Jiang et al, we know that l=2nnormalΨl is radially unbounded. Since Vn=V1+l=2nnormalΨl, the radial unboundednes...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Convergence analysis By Lemma , the following inequality holds: alignleftalign-1l=2nΨlalign-2=l=2nξlxlrθvlξlθvl4θσvlθdralign-1align-2l=2n2vlθ1ξlxl(rξl)4θσvlvldralign-1align-2=l=2nal|xlξl|4θσvl, for positive constants a l ( l =2,…, n ). Discussed as in the work of Jiang et al, we know that l=2nnormalΨl is radially unbounded. Since Vn=V1+l=2nnormalΨl, the radial unboundednes...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found that the stabilization problem for such a kind of nonlinear stochastic system faces many difficulties. Fortunately, the state‐feedback stabilization problem of high‐order stochastic nonlinear systems may be solved by the adding a power integrator method and the Lyapunov‐based recursive design technique . However, it should be noted that the fractional powers of the high‐order systems considered in the existing literature are all required to be not less than one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extensions of this framework for exploring connections between optimal finite‐time stabilization and finite‐time stabilization for stochastic dynamical systems are currently under development. The proposed framework can also allow us to further explore connections with stochastic inverse optimal control, stochastic dissipativity, and stability margins for finite‐time stabilizing regulators that minimize a derived cost functional involving subquadratic terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results provide a generalization of the deterministic meaningful inverse optimal nonlinear regulator stability margins and the classical linear-quadratic optimal regulator gain and phase margins to stochastic nonlinear feedback regulators. Extensions of this framework for exploring connections between optimal finite-time stabilization 27,28 and finite-time stabilization 29 for stochastic dynamical systems are currently under development. The proposed framework can also allow us to further explore connections with stochastic inverse optimal control, stochastic dissipativity, and stability margins for finite-time stabilizing regulators that minimize a derived cost functional involving subquadratic terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%