2020
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2019.2911769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-State Markov Chains Channel Model for CubeSats Communication Uplink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RF-based satellite fading channel can be well characterized by the Nakagami-m model thanks to its capability of describing different fading scenarios, from line-of-sight (LOS) to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) [27]. Furthermore, it was verified in [28] that using the Nakagami-m model can simplify the analysis while maintaining good accuracy. As a result, the PDF of received SNR in RF fading channels, denoted by γ r , can be expressed as [28, Table III]…”
Section: ) Rf Linkmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RF-based satellite fading channel can be well characterized by the Nakagami-m model thanks to its capability of describing different fading scenarios, from line-of-sight (LOS) to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) [27]. Furthermore, it was verified in [28] that using the Nakagami-m model can simplify the analysis while maintaining good accuracy. As a result, the PDF of received SNR in RF fading channels, denoted by γ r , can be expressed as [28, Table III]…”
Section: ) Rf Linkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…whereγ r is the average value of γ r , and m represents for different fading scenarios (refer to [28] for more details). Given PDF of γ r , its CDF can be determined as…”
Section: ) Rf Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salamanca's Model [76]: A finite-state Markov channel with two sectors was introduced in [76] for LMS channel modeling. This adaptive model depends on the elevation angle of the satellite.…”
Section: A Cubesat-to-ground Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patzold [84], Kourogiorgas [85], Abdi [86], and Saunders [87]) or dynamic (e.g., the ones developed by Fontan [88], Scalise [89], Nikolaidis [90], and Lopez-Salamanca [91]). A2G path loss [72] 2018 Resilience [40] Path loss [73] 2021 Power allocation [70] HAPs 2017…”
Section: Recovery Of Terrestrial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%