2013
DOI: 10.1137/120894713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Speed of Propagation for Stochastic Porous Media Equations

Abstract: Abstract. We prove finite speed of propagation for stochastic porous media equations perturbed by linear multiplicative space-time rough signals. Explicit and optimal estimates for the speed of propagation are given. The result applies to any continuous driving signal, thus including fractional Brownian motion for all Hurst parameters. The explicit estimates are then used to prove that the corresponding random attractor has infinite fractal dimension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the controllability has been proved for strictly parabolic equations (even partial differential equations). Here, we shall prove controllability for a porous media type equation (which is an example of a degenerate parabolic equation; see [9,24]):…”
Section: Notions Notations and Formulation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the controllability has been proved for strictly parabolic equations (even partial differential equations). Here, we shall prove controllability for a porous media type equation (which is an example of a degenerate parabolic equation; see [9,24]):…”
Section: Notions Notations and Formulation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ξ denotes space-time white noise. The nonlinear character of ( 1) is that of a fully nonlinear equation rather than a quasi-linear equation, since rewriting (1) as the quasi-linear equation (7) is not helpful as we explain below, and since the deterministic estimates we need are related to the linearization of a fully nonlinear equation, cf. (15), rather than to the linearization of a quasi-linear equation (this distinction would be more pronounced in a multidimensional case).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, structural assumptions allow to mimic an approach that is obvious in the semi-linear case, namely the approach of decomposing the solution into a rough part w that solves a more explicitly treatable stochastic differential equation and a more regular part v that solves a parabolic equation with random coefficients and/or right-hand-side described through w, and then allows for an application of deterministic regularity theory. We refer to [7] for an example with a multiplicative decomposition of this type. The recent work by Debussche et.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stochastic setting, the techniques of [19] have been generalized by [14,25] to provide sufficient criteria for the occurrence of waiting time phenomena and for qualitative results on finite speed of propagation for stochastic p-Laplace and stochastic porous-media equations. For finite speed of propagation for the latter equations, we also mention [2,16] which use different techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%