1981
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/14/6/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite size scaling approach to Anderson localisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
311
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
18
311
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was supported by numerical 8,9,17,18 and analytical investigations 3,5 , with d = 2 being the lower critical dimension of the transition. The question then can be posed what happens in thin films of finite thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This was supported by numerical 8,9,17,18 and analytical investigations 3,5 , with d = 2 being the lower critical dimension of the transition. The question then can be posed what happens in thin films of finite thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We compute it using the TMM [8,20,21] for quasi-1D bars of cross section M × M and length L ≫ M . The stationary Schrödinger equation HΨ = EΨ is rewritten in a recursive form:…”
Section: Transfer-matrix Methods In Anisotropic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by a divergent correlation length ξ ∞ (W ) = C|W − W c | −ν , where ν is the critical exponent and C is a constant [8]. To construct the correlation length of the infinite system ξ ∞ from finite size data Λ M [3,8,20,21], the one-parameter scaling hypothesis [24] is employed,…”
Section: Finite-size Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pichard and Sarma [43] suggest the following in order to calculate the exponent x for the powerlaw decay of the wave function ψ Ec :…”
Section: Where and How Does The Localization Length Diverge?mentioning
confidence: 99%