1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.1814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size effects and Coulomb interactions in quantum Monte Carlo calculations for homogeneous systems with periodic boundary conditions

Abstract: Quantum Monte Carlo ͑QMC͒ calculations are only possible in finite systems and so solids and liquids must be modeled using small simulation cells subject to periodic boundary conditions. The resulting finite-size errors are often corrected using data from local-density functional or Hartree-Fock calculations, but systematic errors remain after these corrections have been applied. The results of our jellium QMC calculations for simulation cells containing more than 600 electrons confirm that the residual errors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
270
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
270
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve this convergence, we follow the common practice [33] of correcting for this error by using separate DFT calculations: we add to the DMC energies the difference ∆E Γ→k between the DFT-LDA energy calculated with a very large set of k-points and the DFT-LDA energy calculated using the same sampling as in the DMC calculation. The question of correcting for finite size errors in the Coulomb energy has been addressed in recent papers [28,29,30], and a method known as the model periodic Coulomb (MPC) interaction has been developed. The finite size error in the Ewald interaction energy arises from the exchange-correlation energy, which can be written as the interaction of the electrons with their exchange-correlation holes.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve this convergence, we follow the common practice [33] of correcting for this error by using separate DFT calculations: we add to the DMC energies the difference ∆E Γ→k between the DFT-LDA energy calculated with a very large set of k-points and the DFT-LDA energy calculated using the same sampling as in the DMC calculation. The question of correcting for finite size errors in the Coulomb energy has been addressed in recent papers [28,29,30], and a method known as the model periodic Coulomb (MPC) interaction has been developed. The finite size error in the Ewald interaction energy arises from the exchange-correlation energy, which can be written as the interaction of the electrons with their exchange-correlation holes.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. This allows us to see explicitly that in the case of solids and finite systems MPC improves convergence considerably (over the more traditional Ewald scheme), due to the fact that for such systems MPC yields the correct quadratic behavior of S k as k → 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] As QMC calculations of solids need to be carried out within a supercell, the Coulomb interaction is typically replaced by the so-called Ewald interaction that is compatible with the supercell geometry. 6 This, in turn, is equivalent to dealing with an infinite system with a periodically repeated exchange-correlation (xc) hole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-point shift (from Γ to L), similar to the "special k-point method" in DFT, frequently works well for insulators. 59,60 The MPC (model periodic Coulomb interaction) 61,62 and CCMH (Chiesa, Ceperley, Martin, and Holzmann) 63 schemes are known to be effective two-body schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%