2013
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364013150150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size effect in shot noise in hopping conduction

Abstract: We study a current shot noise in a macroscopic insulator based on a two-dimensional electron system in GaAs in a variable range hopping (VRH) regime. At low temperature and in a sufficiently depleted sample a shot noise close to a full Poissonian value is measured. This suggests an observation of a finite-size effect in shot noise in the VRH conduction and demonstrates a possibility of accurate quasiparticle charge measurements in the insulating regime.As first shown by Schottky for the case of a vacuum tube, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of F = 1 in B = 0 reproduces our previous result 39 and signals that transport in zero field occurs via VRH conduction in the regime of finite-size effect, when the width of the gate, L, is not greater than the size of the critical cluster, ξ. Compared to longer devices with L ξ in which the random resistance network is very well interconnected 17 , see the sketch c1 of fig.…”
Section: Shot Noise Of a Quantum Hall Insulatorsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation

Noise insights into electronic transport

Piatrusha,
Ginzburg,
Tikhonov
et al. 2018
Preprint
Self Cite
“…The observation of F = 1 in B = 0 reproduces our previous result 39 and signals that transport in zero field occurs via VRH conduction in the regime of finite-size effect, when the width of the gate, L, is not greater than the size of the critical cluster, ξ. Compared to longer devices with L ξ in which the random resistance network is very well interconnected 17 , see the sketch c1 of fig.…”
Section: Shot Noise Of a Quantum Hall Insulatorsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this case, the Fano factor is inversely proportional to the number of hardhops, F ∼ 1/N , and for N = 1 can reach F ∼ 1, as predicted by theory 38 and consistent with experiments. Remarkably, in GaAs 2DES at low T and deep enough in the insulating regime the Poissonian noise with F = 1 ± 0.1 was demonstrated 39 . This motivates us to study shot noise in quantizing magnetic fields, where Poissonian current statistics would enable, e.g., a direct measurement of the quasiparticle charge in the bulk of the insulating state in the FQHE.…”
Section: Shot Noise Of a Quantum Hall Insulatormentioning
confidence: 94%

Noise insights into electronic transport

Piatrusha,
Ginzburg,
Tikhonov
et al. 2018
Preprint
Self Cite
“…This is a plausible situation for our junctions, in which the quasiparticle density of states in the nodal direction increases linearly with voltage. We note thatΓ = 2/3 was predicted for a diffusive conductor on the basis of the random matrix theory [35]; this fact was used in [36] to calculate the shot noise.Γ between 0 and 0.4, similar to what we used to fit the data, was observed in [37] for transport through a barrier in GaAs structures.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We note that Γ = 2/3 was predicted for a diffusive conductor on the basis of the random matrix theory [35]; this fact was used in [36] to calculate the shot noise. Γ between 0 and 0.4, similar to what we used to fit the data, was observed in [37] for transport through a barrier in GaAs structures.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…When the tunnel barrier is thick, multiple hopping through the LS network becomes dominant [21]. In this case, F decreases from unity, depending on the number of hopping events (N), the network structure, and dimensionality [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. In a simple one-dimensional network with N identical barriers, theory gives F = 1/N [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%