1996
DOI: 10.2307/1392442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three main ways of implementing the gmm estimator: the two-stage, the iterative and the continuous updating gmm estimators (Hansen et al 1996). According to Newey and Smith (2004) and Anatolyev (2005), the three methods are asymptotically equivalent, but the second-order bias of the continuous updating estimator is smaller, and the iterations increase the estimator's efficiency.…”
Section: Estimation By the Generalized Methods Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main ways of implementing the gmm estimator: the two-stage, the iterative and the continuous updating gmm estimators (Hansen et al 1996). According to Newey and Smith (2004) and Anatolyev (2005), the three methods are asymptotically equivalent, but the second-order bias of the continuous updating estimator is smaller, and the iterations increase the estimator's efficiency.…”
Section: Estimation By the Generalized Methods Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…046114-4 20, so that in each bin a probability mass of F λ,σ 0 (x j ) − F λ,σ 0 (x j −1 ) ≈ 0.05 is obtained. λ 2 q was calculated using q = 0.5 after the series was filtered by the sample estimate σ .…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , 20. At a significance level of 0.05, the J-test statistics would allow one to reject the multifractal cascade as the data-generating process only for the Swiss francs (CHF), on the basis of our chosen moment functions.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen et al (1996) found evidence that GMM-type estimators behave differently in the presence of weak identification. According to them, the continuous updating estimator is less biased, and its confidence intervals have better coverage rates than the two-step GMM.…”
Section: Joint Estimation By Gmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterated GMM estimator continues this process, evaluating ̂ ̂ at the previous estimate of until reaching convergence, obtaining ̂ (Ferson & Foerster, 1994). Hansen, Heaton and Yaron (1996) suggested minimizing the following quadratic form of the sample moments:…”
Section: Joint Estimation By Gmmmentioning
confidence: 99%