1980
DOI: 10.2307/1268460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Sample Properties of Ridge Estimators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x 1 is an n × 1 vector of observations on an independent variable, X 2 is an n × (k − 1) matrix of 1 The double k-class estimator is proposed by Ullah and Ullah (1978 observations on other explanatory variables. β = [β 1 , β 2 ] is a k × 1 vector of regression coefficients for X, β 1 is a scalar coefficient for x 1 in which we have a special interest, β 2 is a (k − 1) × 1 vector of coefficients for X 2 , and ε is an n × 1 vector of error terms.…”
Section: Model and Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x 1 is an n × 1 vector of observations on an independent variable, X 2 is an n × (k − 1) matrix of 1 The double k-class estimator is proposed by Ullah and Ullah (1978 observations on other explanatory variables. β = [β 1 , β 2 ] is a k × 1 vector of regression coefficients for X, β 1 is a scalar coefficient for x 1 in which we have a special interest, β 2 is a (k − 1) × 1 vector of coefficients for X 2 , and ε is an n × 1 vector of error terms.…”
Section: Model and Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the ridge regression estimator may have smaller MSE than the OLS estimator even if multicollinearity does not exist, many recent studies focused on the small sample properties of the ridge regression estimator. [See, for example, Dwivedi et al (1980) and Kozumi and Ohtani (1994).] In applied regression analysis, we may be interested in a specific regression coefficient rather than all of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between these RR estimators will be discussed in Section 2. Dwivedi, Srivastava and Hall (1980) derived the exact first two moments of the GRR estimator and showed that the GRR estimator has a smaller mean square error (MSE) than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator if the noncentrality parameter does not exceed two. Based on their results, the exact finite sample properties of the GRR estimator and its variant (a, a pre-test estimator consisting of the GRR and OLS estimators) have been investigated from various aspects.…”
Section: Kozumi and Ohtanimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the finding of Hoerl and Kennard [1], lots of variants of the ridge regression estimator are proposed and their sampling properties have been investigated. Some examples are Dwivedi et al [2], Ohtani [3,4] and Firinguetti [5][6][7]. Huang [8] proposed the choice of the so-called ridge parameter which minimizes the MSE of the ridge regression estimator when our concern is to estimate each individual regression coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%