1988
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/21/7/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-range scaling for a one-dimensional system with long-range interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to carry out the calculations we chose σ = 0.75, because for this value of the parameter the critical exponents of the Ising model are expected to be sufficiently different from mean-field values (σ = 0.50) to allow a meaningful comparison with RG results [21][22][23]. Furthermore, one also likes to be as far as possible from σ = 1.00, where strong Kosterlitz-Thouless behaviour is known to occur [24].…”
Section: The Ising Model With Lr Interactions and The Simulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to carry out the calculations we chose σ = 0.75, because for this value of the parameter the critical exponents of the Ising model are expected to be sufficiently different from mean-field values (σ = 0.50) to allow a meaningful comparison with RG results [21][22][23]. Furthermore, one also likes to be as far as possible from σ = 1.00, where strong Kosterlitz-Thouless behaviour is known to occur [24].…”
Section: The Ising Model With Lr Interactions and The Simulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be interesting to perform a complementary study of a more general case of the Yang-Lee zeros for the Potts model with infinite range interactions with the power-law decay, where some previous work has been performed [30] for the Ising model by the finite-range scaling approach [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare, in Fig. 6, we plot our extrapolated critical temperature values together with those extrapolations given by Uzelac [17], Cannas [11], Nagle and Bonner [9], Monroe [6,13], Pires [18], and Luijten [20,21]. Our critical temperatures as a function of p fall within the upper and lower bounds (0.313, 0.658) reported by Monroe [35] and show a better coincidence with many existing approximations for p close to 1 than for the p values near 2.…”
Section: Critical Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After some years, in 1982, Fröhlich and Spencer [2] proved the existence of a phase transition for p = 2. Since the original demonstration of phase transition existence by Dyson, who did not provide a critical value, many approximations have been reported to give the critical temperatures for 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 using different methods: variational [5], coherent anomaly [6], ζ-function [7], finite-range [8], series expansion [9], renormalization group [10,11], Monte Carlo [12], Bethe Lattice approximation [13], cluster approach [14], among others [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%