1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.51.1558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Pressure-Gradient Influences on Ideal Spheromak Equilibrium

Abstract: Spatially resolved measurements of the magnetic field of a spheromak have been analyzed and compared with expectations for the ratio of j\\/B from the pre s sure-gradientfree Taylor model and a model with pressure due to Morikawa. Better agreement is found with the model containing finite pressure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most interesting part of this spheromak solution is the nonconstant profile for J · B/B 2 plotted against normalized distance from the magnetic axis. This profile shows peaks outside the magnetic axis, and this feature is qualitatively closer to the experimentally observed profile reported by Hart et al [Hart et al, 1983].…”
Section: Single Fluid Mdr Based Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most interesting part of this spheromak solution is the nonconstant profile for J · B/B 2 plotted against normalized distance from the magnetic axis. This profile shows peaks outside the magnetic axis, and this feature is qualitatively closer to the experimentally observed profile reported by Hart et al [Hart et al, 1983].…”
Section: Single Fluid Mdr Based Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, spheromaks often have p values above those predicted. 9 ' 10 In this Letter, strong evidence for a pressure-driven instability in CTX 11 spheromaks is presented. The instability leads to a distinct event in the discharge which can be analyzed in detail.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These analytic solutions should be useful for extending interchange stability calculations [21][22][23] of spheromaks to finite ␤ and also for suggesting optimum wall shapes. Figure 2 gives plots of q wall , q axis , ␤, and h/r 0 as functions of ␥r 0 and kr 0 ; the locus of solutions with ␥r 0 ϭx 01 ϭ2.405 are the ␤ϭ0, force-free solutions.…”
Section: B Safety Factormentioning
confidence: 99%