2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite order spreading models

Abstract: Extending the classical notion of the spreading model, the kspreading models of a Banach space are introduced, for every k ∈ N. The definition, which is based on the k-sequences and plegma families, reveals a new class of spreading sequences associated to a Banach space. Most of the results of the classical theory are stated and proved in the higher order setting. Moreover, new phenomena like the universality of the class of the 2-spreading models of c 0 and the composition property are established. As consequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, if it had a weakly null subsequence, as it is well known, it would generates an unconditional spreading model. If it had a subsequence converging weakly to a non-zero element it would generate a singular spreading model or an ℓ 1 spreading model (see [AKT1,Theorem 38,page 592]), or if it had a norm convergent subsequence it would generate a trivial spreading model (i.e. a spreading sequence in seminormed space that is not a normed space).…”
Section: Spreading Models Of Non-reflexive Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, if it had a weakly null subsequence, as it is well known, it would generates an unconditional spreading model. If it had a subsequence converging weakly to a non-zero element it would generate a singular spreading model or an ℓ 1 spreading model (see [AKT1,Theorem 38,page 592]), or if it had a norm convergent subsequence it would generate a trivial spreading model (i.e. a spreading sequence in seminormed space that is not a normed space).…”
Section: Spreading Models Of Non-reflexive Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof involves a construction similar to that of Schreier's space S from [S], a space that has a weakly null basis generating an ℓ 1 spreading model, yet the space S embeds into C(ω ω ). A noteworthy fact that was proved in [AKT1] is that c 0 admits every possible spreading sequence as a 2-spreading model. This is a notion of spreading models introduced and studied in [AKT1] and [AKT2] where there is developed an entire theory surrounding the so called ξ-spreading models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the main results of the paper are Corollary 21 and Theorems 18,19,23 and 25. It is worth to mention that in general SM w ξ (X) does not coincide with SM w 1 (X), and therefore the transfinite hierarchy (SM w ξ (X)) ξ<ω1 is not trivial. In fact, for every k there exists a Banach space X such that SM w k (X) is a proper subset of SM w k+1 (X) [AKT1]. Moreover, there are reflexive Banach spaces X and Y which have, up to equivalence, the same set of spreading models of the first order but not of the second order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], the authors construct a space not admitting an ℓ p , c 0 or reflexive spreading model. In paper [3] they show that a variant of the space X S does not admit any ℓ p or c 0 as a k-iterated spreading model for any k ∈ N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%