2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.214406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FiniteU-induced competing interactions, frustration, and quantum phase transition in a triangular-lattice antiferromagnet

Abstract: The 120 0 ordered antiferromagnetic state of the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice presents an interesting case of U -controlled competing interactions and frustration. The spin stiffness is found to vanish at U * stiff ≈ 6 and the spin-wave energy ωM at q M = (2π/3, 0) etc. is found to vanish at U * M ≈ 6.8 due to competing spin couplings generated at finite U . The loss of magnetic order due to the magnetic instability at qM yields a first-order quantum phase transition in the insulating state at U = U *… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(38 reference statements)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(a) shows a typical structure factor S (q, ω) evaluated in the 120 • ordered phase away from the phase boundaries. The ordering wavevector is at the K points in the BZ, and spectral weight vanishes at the Γ point in agreement with previous results [45], in which only the t = 0 case was studied. This coplanar but non-collinear state has three spin excitation modes; at low energies the susceptibility matrix is approximately diagonal in global coordinates µ = x, y, z, allowing us to characterize each of these modes as having either purely inplane (S x , S y ) or out-of-plane (S z ) character.…”
Section: Spin Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2(a) shows a typical structure factor S (q, ω) evaluated in the 120 • ordered phase away from the phase boundaries. The ordering wavevector is at the K points in the BZ, and spectral weight vanishes at the Γ point in agreement with previous results [45], in which only the t = 0 case was studied. This coplanar but non-collinear state has three spin excitation modes; at low energies the susceptibility matrix is approximately diagonal in global coordinates µ = x, y, z, allowing us to characterize each of these modes as having either purely inplane (S x , S y ) or out-of-plane (S z ) character.…”
Section: Spin Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We also confirmed a strong particle-hole asymmetry, as was seen for the t = 0 model in Ref. [45], but since a full study of the doping dependent phase diagram is beyond the scope of this work we concentrate on the case of half-filling for the remainder.…”
Section: Spin Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same antiferromagnetic state has also been found on the triangular lattice. [62][63][64] The further-neighbor interaction is decoupled in a similar way:…”
Section: Hartree-fock Approximation In the Spinful Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of spin mixing terms in the Hamiltonian (equations (1) and (2)), spin is not a good quantum number, and we therefore use the general method to investigate spin waves [13]. In the (π, π, π) AFM ground state 0 Y ñ | of the three-orbital model, we consider the time-ordered transverse spin fluctuation propagator in the composite orbital-sublattice basis:…”
Section: Spin Wave Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%