1977
DOI: 10.1109/t-pas.1977.32425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite length effects in linear induction machines with different iron contours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it was also shown in [3] this does not have any influence on the accuracy of the calculated results of the electromagnetic field distribution along the active zone of the air-gap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As it was also shown in [3] this does not have any influence on the accuracy of the calculated results of the electromagnetic field distribution along the active zone of the air-gap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Numerical methods allow taking into account not only the nonlinearity of the motor iron core but also its geometrical structure (slot dimensions and finite stator and rotor length). Some analytical methods, like that one based on Fourier series technique, allow the consideration of, in an equivalent way [51], the motor geometry. However, the local nonlinearities are hard to include.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary core is infinitely long and wide in the computational model, while the infinitely thin current sheet has the dimensions adequate to the surface of the real armature. There are papers [50,51] applying the Fourier's series method, which takes into account the finite dimensions of the primary core. The results contained in [51] indicate that this has little effect on motor performance.…”
Section: -D Field Model Of Im-2dmfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One description in particular (Duncan, 1983), based on an average model of the non-saturated LIM, and later expanded to include saturation (Woronowicz and Safaee, 2014), has been adopted by authors developing LIM control algorithms (Woronowicz and Palka, 2002; Woronowicz and Palka, 2003). The established analytical models of the LIM typically express the excitation currents in the primary coils as infinitely thin current sheet (Nasar and Boldea, 1976; Yamamura, 1979; Freeman and Lowther, 1973; Mosebach et al , 1977; Pierson et al , 1977; Freeman and Papageorgiou, 1978; Gieras et al , 1985; Gieras et al , 1986; Mendrela and Gierczak, 1982). However, in recent decades, LIM modeling and analysis started relying more on finite element analysis (FEA) simulations, such as in studies by Lee et al (2009); Shiri and Shoulaie (2012); Singh et al (2013); Amiri and Mendrela (2014); Abdollahi et al (2015); Jeong et al (2015), instead of analytical solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%