Finite Element Method - Simulation, Numerical Analysis and Solution Techniques 2018
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Thermal Analysis of Metal Parts Additively Manufactured via Selective Laser Melting

Abstract: In this chapter, a three-dimensional finite element model is developed to simulate the thermal behavior of the molten pool in selective laser melting (SLM) process. Laser-based additive manufacturing (AM) is a near net shape manufacturing process able to produce 3D objects. They are layer-wise built through selective melting of a metal powder bed. The necessary energy is provided by a laser source. The interaction between laser and material occurs within a few microseconds, hence the transient thermal behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One key challenge is then to ensure that the model generates sufficiently accurate results in a limited amount of time, not exceeding the experimentation cost. Despite various attempts to simulate the process (as reviewed by [7], or more recently [8][9][10] for example), experimental validation of SLM models is indeed still an open issue that has been sparingly discussed in the recent literature. Many models have been validated employing post-experiment melt pool measurement by observing the metallographic cross-sections of the produced samples [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key challenge is then to ensure that the model generates sufficiently accurate results in a limited amount of time, not exceeding the experimentation cost. Despite various attempts to simulate the process (as reviewed by [7], or more recently [8][9][10] for example), experimental validation of SLM models is indeed still an open issue that has been sparingly discussed in the recent literature. Many models have been validated employing post-experiment melt pool measurement by observing the metallographic cross-sections of the produced samples [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula ( 1) is simple and very convenient to compute the total strain ϵ, since the key ingredient of the inherent strain method is to assume that ϵ * is known. In SLM many parameters affect the deformation of the part: of course the material properties, but also the machine parameters (power, speed and trajectory of the laser [12], [25], [26], [29]), acting directly on the heating and cooling behaviour of the part that cause the deformation. To find the inherent strain tensor ϵ * corresponding to a given set of machine parameters, one simple solution is to manufacture a test part, and match the deflection measured experimentally with the one obtained numerically with the right inherent strain tensor.…”
Section: A Process Simulation Using the Inherent Strain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiating L with respect to ûi gives the variational formulation of the adjoint problem (28). Assuming that the solutions v, u i are shape differentiable and differentiating L with respect to ω in the direction of the vector field θ, we obtain the desired shape derivative (29). Since Γ Ncut ⊂ Γ D and θ vanishes on Γ D , the integral on Γ Ncut in the Lagrangian (30) does not contribute to the shape derivative.…”
Section: Model Of Baseplate Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the laser melting occurs along the outline (contour) of the structure, following a continuous path. Subsequently, the printer carries out the surface area exposure, running a hatch pattern over the larger bulk areas [34,35].…”
Section: Catalyst Synthesis By 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%