2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(02)00218-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation of strain localization with large deformation: capturing strong discontinuity using a Petrov–Galerkin multiscale formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of this paper, we will use small strain assumptions. Strong discontinuity kinematics in a finite deformation setting are described in more detail in [22,38].…”
Section: Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purposes of this paper, we will use small strain assumptions. Strong discontinuity kinematics in a finite deformation setting are described in more detail in [22,38].…”
Section: Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation in this paper follows the strong discontinuity formulation of Simo and co-workers [20,21], and more closely the reformulation of Borja and Regueiro [33][34][35][36][37][38], which is described in more detail in Section 3. Other sub-classes of this element type have been described and differ primarily in the way the extra degrees of freedom are condensed; see [30,39] for reviews of the various types of these elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displacement field u(X) in the current configuration is conventionally decomposed as [43][44][45] …”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of finite element (FE) analysis, there are many alternative approaches that one can possibly pursue to model thrust faulting, including: (a) the embedded discontinuity approach [9,11,15,16]; (b) the extended finite element approach, or XFEM [29,40,57]; and (c) the contact mechanics technique [5,20,31,44,58,73,93]. All of these approaches entail some form of regularization to characterize the thickness of the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the layers fold their geometry changes and the directions of the principal stress axes rotate. Faults are structural features that translate and rotate with the deforming domain; their motions are also tracked by the Lagrangian formulation [10,11]. Compared to kilometer-scale folding the fault thickness is very small, so in this paper we assume that the fault thickness is zero [2,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%