2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation of compressible particle-laden gas flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either operator splitting techniques as presented in Section 5.1 and applied in [38] to stationary as well as non-stationary problems may be employed, or the equations may be integrated in time by the fully coupled implicit time integration as discussed in Chapter 5.2. At first glance, the former approach significantly reduces the computational costs since the arising algebraic systems can be solved separately.…”
Section: Operator Splitting Vs Fully Coupled Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Either operator splitting techniques as presented in Section 5.1 and applied in [38] to stationary as well as non-stationary problems may be employed, or the equations may be integrated in time by the fully coupled implicit time integration as discussed in Chapter 5.2. At first glance, the former approach significantly reduces the computational costs since the arising algebraic systems can be solved separately.…”
Section: Operator Splitting Vs Fully Coupled Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restriction to one wave simplifies the solution of the boundary Riemann problem of the particulate phase. To avoid unphysical boundary layers [38], we use the same boundary Riemann solver as for the gas phase [38,9]. The flux formula of Roe is given by…”
Section: Inlet and Outlet Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that in real applications, the drag coefficient µ is not constant (depends on the Reynolds number of the particles). For physical applications with non-constant drag coefficient, we refer to [6,8,9,24]. Here we assume µ = 0.2 is constant.…”
Section: Riemann Problem Solution: Numerical Solutions Vs Theoretical...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several numerical methods for dusty gas flow models can be found in, for example, [6,25,26,27,40,45,50,51]. However, efficiency, accuracy and resolution of these methods are limited due to strong singularities typically developed in the pressureless dusty fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%