Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/293/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation and comparison of a shear strain and equivalent strain during ECAP and asymmetric rolling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires at least three or four passes of ECAP with a simple shear. This level can be obtained by single-pass asymmetric rolling with simultaneous pure and simple shear, when shear angle ϕ is no less than 80 • (Figure 26) [73].…”
Section: Shear Strain and Equivalent Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires at least three or four passes of ECAP with a simple shear. This level can be obtained by single-pass asymmetric rolling with simultaneous pure and simple shear, when shear angle ϕ is no less than 80 • (Figure 26) [73].…”
Section: Shear Strain and Equivalent Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking advantage of the previous work, Pesin and coworkers [24] performed FE simulations to investigate and compare the deformation on the aluminum alloy 5083 obtained by a single-pass equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) symmetric and asymmetric rolling processes. The ECAP is limited to small-size samples, which represents a drawback for industrial applications.…”
Section: Sverdlik and Coworkersmentioning
confidence: 99%