2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Models Used to Determine the Equivalent In-plane Properties of Honeycombs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 14 shows the frequency variation with different embedded depths of the plate for the first five modes. e frequencies clearly decrease (increase) with an increase in the embedded depth for modes 1, 2, and 4. e frequencies of modes 3 and 5 first increase and then decrease, and the inflection point is located at ∼7.5 mm depth, indicating a certain mutation between the embedded depth and the plate stiffness [11,[30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Effect Of Embedded Depthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 14 shows the frequency variation with different embedded depths of the plate for the first five modes. e frequencies clearly decrease (increase) with an increase in the embedded depth for modes 1, 2, and 4. e frequencies of modes 3 and 5 first increase and then decrease, and the inflection point is located at ∼7.5 mm depth, indicating a certain mutation between the embedded depth and the plate stiffness [11,[30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Effect Of Embedded Depthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The in-plane properties include four elastic properties; shear modulus ( G x z ), two moduli of elasticity ( E x , E z ), and Poisson’s ratio (υ xz ). They are estimated according to the following formulas 23,24 :…”
Section: Theoretical Approaches and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the in‐plane equivalent mechanical properties of honeycombs, two different finite element (FE) models, 3D beam model, and 3D solid model are developed in ANSYS (version 13.0, ANSYS Inc.), using Ansys Programming Design Language (APDL). Explicit modeling of the complete block (Figure a), can increase very much the total number of elements and of course the number of Degrees of Freedom (DOFs), increasing the computation effort without few benefits for practical problems . For simplicity reasons, numerical methods to estimate mechanical properties of heterogeneous materials usually involve analysis of a representative volume element (RVE) corresponding to structural periodic arrangement .…”
Section: Models and Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit modeling of the complete block (Figure a), can increase very much the total number of elements and of course the number of Degrees of Freedom (DOFs), increasing the computation effort without few benefits for practical problems . For simplicity reasons, numerical methods to estimate mechanical properties of heterogeneous materials usually involve analysis of a representative volume element (RVE) corresponding to structural periodic arrangement . Therefore, the representative volume elements (RVEs) for both the new honeycomb and SRH are considered for the developed finite element models, as shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Models and Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%