1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(97)88326-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modelling of plantar pressure beneath the second ray with flexor muscle loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research by other investigators included a partial 2D model of a sagittal section including the second metatarsal and plantar and dorsal soft tissue [12,35] and proximal phalanx and tendon [13]; 2D models of five plantar sections including bones, ligaments, cartilages, plantar fascia and fat pad in the standing position [11,30]; a two-arch 3D model of the foot in the pushoff stance including bones, cartilage, ligaments and plantar soft tissue [15,31]; a 3D model of the foot and ankle in the standing position including bones, cartilages, ligaments and plantar fascia [17]. The main differentiating characteristic of our work is that the issues of model verification and validation were addressed in a systematic way, giving clear indication of the influence of model parameters in the results and how the errors of discretization were estimated and controlled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by other investigators included a partial 2D model of a sagittal section including the second metatarsal and plantar and dorsal soft tissue [12,35] and proximal phalanx and tendon [13]; 2D models of five plantar sections including bones, ligaments, cartilages, plantar fascia and fat pad in the standing position [11,30]; a two-arch 3D model of the foot in the pushoff stance including bones, cartilage, ligaments and plantar soft tissue [15,31]; a 3D model of the foot and ankle in the standing position including bones, cartilages, ligaments and plantar fascia [17]. The main differentiating characteristic of our work is that the issues of model verification and validation were addressed in a systematic way, giving clear indication of the influence of model parameters in the results and how the errors of discretization were estimated and controlled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant improvement as compared with previous FE models which have joints that were over-constrained by "fusing" them [22][23][24]26,27,36] or using kinematic-controlled "connectors" [25,38]. Neither of these two reflect the anatomical joint constraints that are actually governed by the bony congruence facets and passive stabilizers (i.e., ligaments and fascia) [39].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[ 6 12 ] Lemmon et al developed numerical models for numerical studies on the influence of the thickness of the therapeutic footwear on the tissue, reporting an accuracy of 5.9% compared to the experimental ones. [ 13 , 14 ] Gefen [ 15 , 16 ] developed 2D finite-element models useful for target surgery in a leg in vertical position. At the same time, Cheung et al [ 17 , 18 ] used three-dimensional models of a leg, corresponding to a vertical position, and investigated the effects of changes in rigidity, as well as those of force changes in the Achilles tendon, using forces between 0 and 700 N. Using FEM, Johnson and Haihua [ 19 ] also showed that general rigidity of the foot and of the plantar aponeurosis are strongly influenced by the ankle bearing and attachment conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%