2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modelling of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber composites: Embedded elements technique and experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2D Shell simulation and embedded elements displayed prediction errors of 7.69% and 4.72%, respectively, compared to the tensile test. These errors are consistent with those observed by Avanzini et al, 32 who found errors ranging from 2.2%–3.5% and 0.9%–3.6% for the 2D shell simulation and embedded elements, respectively. When the experimental specimen reaches its failure load, the simulation shows maximum stresses of 81 MPa and 3350 MPa for the matrix (Onyx) and fibers, respectively (Figures 17(a) and (b)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The 2D Shell simulation and embedded elements displayed prediction errors of 7.69% and 4.72%, respectively, compared to the tensile test. These errors are consistent with those observed by Avanzini et al, 32 who found errors ranging from 2.2%–3.5% and 0.9%–3.6% for the 2D shell simulation and embedded elements, respectively. When the experimental specimen reaches its failure load, the simulation shows maximum stresses of 81 MPa and 3350 MPa for the matrix (Onyx) and fibers, respectively (Figures 17(a) and (b)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…79,87 The finite element prediction method (FEM) should be developed to analyze 3D printed CNFRCs, which could better represent the damage evolution process of the composites. 88,89 Furthermore, it was paramount to underscore the necessity of incorporating theoretical computational models that aptly account for the distinctive attributes characteristic of 3D printed CNFRCs. These models were indispensable tools for the in-depth exploration of the mechanical properties underpinning this specialized class of composite materials.…”
Section: Limitation and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was imperative to recognize that while the ML paradigm furnished ultimate predictive outcomes, it inherently lacked the capacity to elucidate the analytical trajectory or the evolution process of damage within the fabricated composites 79,87 . The finite element prediction method (FEM) should be developed to analyze 3D printed CNFRCs, which could better represent the damage evolution process of the composites 88,89 . Furthermore, it was paramount to underscore the necessity of incorporating theoretical computational models that aptly account for the distinctive attributes characteristic of 3D printed CNFRCs.…”
Section: Limitation and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [ 19 ], this can be disregarded in most cases when shear weak materials are used. An alternative to the approach of using principal directions is presented by Avanzini et al [ 20 ]. They applied the embedded elements method, the effectiveness of which could not be sufficiently verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%