2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002588
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Element Modeling of Progressive Failure for Floor-to-Floor Assembly in the Precast Cross-Wall Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the load-bearing performance and stiffness of FEM-5 become unstable due to the fracture of the steel beam flanges in the tension zone. These findings underscore the significant role of the connection types in influencing the load-bearing capacity and structural stability, with FEM-6 demonstrating a superior performance in these aspects [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Comparison Of Fem-5 and Fem-6mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…On the contrary, the load-bearing performance and stiffness of FEM-5 become unstable due to the fracture of the steel beam flanges in the tension zone. These findings underscore the significant role of the connection types in influencing the load-bearing capacity and structural stability, with FEM-6 demonstrating a superior performance in these aspects [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Comparison Of Fem-5 and Fem-6mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It should be noted at this point that the columns' linear-elastic behaviour was supported by the lack of damage to these elements during the test. The ABAQUS concrete damage plasticity model [12,[41][42][43][44][45] was used for the concrete in the slabs, including concrete cracking and crushing for tensile and compressive behaviour, respectively. Compression was defined from Eurocode 2 [40] considering the mechanical parameters given in Table 1.…”
Section: Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches can demonstrate (or not) that the structure has a minimum level of robustness and highlight potential areas for improvement, extracting conclusions to increase the resilience of a structure against accidental actions. Research studies to date have concentrated on both computational simulations (e.g., [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]) and experimental analysis (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]), together with studies of real events of progressive collapse [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review clearly shows that preventing progressive collapse in precast structures is still a serious challenge. In this paper, to study the adequacy and applicability of the TF method in British Standard, Eurocodes, and DoD 2013 extensive parametric 3D analysis of floor-to-floor systems has been conducted, using the developed method proposed by authors [43]. The results obtained will improve…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, to study the adequacy and applicability of the TF method in British Standard, Eurocodes, and DoD 2013 extensive parametric 3D analysis of floor-to-floor systems has been conducted, using the developed method proposed by authors [43]. The results obtained will improve the understanding of the mechanism of how tie bars will contribute to the resistance of loads, for structures subjected to local damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%