2010
DOI: 10.12989/sss.2010.6.4.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element model updating of Kömürhan highway bridge based on experimental measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these comparisons, it was determined that experimental data differ from analytical data. To eliminate these differences, a calibration study was conducted using the numerical model recommended in literature [15,19,20,21]. The comparisons allowed some modifications of material properties so as to obtain an optimum level, without changing boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these comparisons, it was determined that experimental data differ from analytical data. To eliminate these differences, a calibration study was conducted using the numerical model recommended in literature [15,19,20,21]. The comparisons allowed some modifications of material properties so as to obtain an optimum level, without changing boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the terms in (7) are obtained by (8) and those are replaced in (6), the second invariant of the deviatoric stress tensor can be obtained, the expression of which is below.…”
Section: Drucker-prager Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the differences between analytical and experimental results come from the inaccurate in the analytical model; these inaccurate are due to boundary conditions and material properties. In addition, both of boundary conditions and material properties are selected as update parameters in a finite element model update procedure [7,8,35]. However, the material properties of historical structures are very difficult to select or define.…”
Section: Operational Modal Analysis and Experimental Dynamic Charactementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is called as finite element model updating, and can be considered as an attempt to use the best features from both the analytical and experimental models [20]. There are many studies in the literature about finite element model updating of engineering structures [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%