2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-021-05752-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Model Prediction of Charge Weld Behaviour in AA6082 and AA6063 Extruded Profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where is the flow stress, the strain, the strain rate, T the temperature (K) and A, m1-m9 the material parameters to be regressed over experimental trials. These material parameters were taken from [10] The friction conditions between workpiece and tools were taken from [10]. The optimized default values for extrusion are reported in Tab.…”
Section: Numerical and Analytical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the flow stress, the strain, the strain rate, T the temperature (K) and A, m1-m9 the material parameters to be regressed over experimental trials. These material parameters were taken from [10] The friction conditions between workpiece and tools were taken from [10]. The optimized default values for extrusion are reported in Tab.…”
Section: Numerical and Analytical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d). The defect contamination starts at the end of an extrusion (negative distance with respect to stop-mark, which is a clearly visible mark on the profile surface generated by the adhesion of the material on the bearing zone in the billet replacement [6,7]) and ends on charge welds at positive values after the stop-mark. The behaviour of the skin defect was studied mostly by experiments: Finkelnburg WD et al [8], Kim YT et al [1] and Jowett C et al [9] studied the billet surface flow to quantify the effect of the process parameters on the inflow of billet skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of these defects and practical suggestions on how to avoid them were published in several works [2][3][4][5]. Additionally, the specific defects such as streaking lines [6][7][8], insufficient welding quality [9][10][11][12][13], back-end defect [14][15][16], charge weld propagation [16][17][18][19], surface speed cracking [20,21] defects related to microstructure [22,23] etc. have been investigated in more details using numerical simulations and industrial trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%